Hi all,
Sara Bauer posted this item as part of a group in the
NWP Book Group Ning. But it's a question you all might have some thoughts/interest in here too, so I'm posting her question here. Any thoughts? Sara wrote:
"I'm curious about how you reinvent the classics or work to make them applicable to 21st Century students.
My colleagues from the NWP @ Rutgers, Joy Mazur and Kristy Lauricella, will co-present a session about how we use technology for this purpose. I will invite them into this discussion so that they can share their own techniques in the near future.
After thinking carefully about audience and authentic audience, and reflecting on the words of Will Richardson, who delivered a keynote at our Mid-winter Conference in February, I have worked to incorporate podcasting for this purpose. This year, my sophomores in American Studies worked together to create two podcasts. One focuses on The Grapes of Wrath, the other on The Scarlet Letter. Because they worked exclusively to satisfy an audience of their peers, the ideas and the delivery were catchy and appealing for teenagers. This is not to say they weren't academically appropriate or "thin." I was pleased to find that, without my lectures or explicit instruction, students were capable of hitting upon all the things I wanted them to learn: history of the text, author background, themes, characterization, symbolism, setting. Since they unearthed these things themselves, through research, and translated them into podcast segments, their learning is thorough and I suspect they are more likely to retain the information than if I had delivered it and asked them to retain it for the purpose of answering test questions.
In teaching the classics, do we, as English teachers, default to preparing our students to become little English teachers? I sometimes find it difficult to resist the temptation. What works for me is consideration of the question "What is this book good for?" I find my students answer this question more thoroughly than I do."